www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-170) What Defines Distribution?
Date Mon, 11 May 2015 00:19:59 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-170.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

My apologies, but this is something to take up with your own legal counsel.

I will note that the Apache License 2.0 does not have a condition requiring the posting of
source code.

> What Defines Distribution?
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-170
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-170
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: RIcky Houtris
>
> We are intending to use several apps on internet servers  that are covered by the Apache
license version 2.  Our clients are going to access the data on these servers for a fee but
not download any of the apps covered by these license.  Can I assume that the apps are not
being distributed and therefor only comply with the licenses on the actual servers that only
have our own in-house administrator access; or would we have to comply by posting notices
and source code in some other way that is not that clear to us?
> I would rather ask for direction in the first place than get into an argument about non-compliance.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message