www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Comment Edited] (LEGAL-90) What are the licensing implications for statistical information drawn from non-ASL2-licensed data, e.g. word frequency lists from Wikipedia dumps?
Date Sun, 10 May 2015 23:40:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-90?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14537425#comment-14537425
] 

Henri Yandell edited comment on LEGAL-90 at 5/10/15 11:39 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Is this still required Steve?

I think you answered it yourself, though it's a bit circular:

Loose language:  "Can I generate a model from a non-category-A licensed work?"  "Yes, as long
as the model is not a derivative of the work". 

Whether it's a derivative will probably depend on both the license, but more importantly on
what of the original work ends up in the model. 


was (Author: bayard):
Is this still require Steve?

I think you answered it yourself, though it's a bit circular:

Loose language:  "Can I generate a model from a non-category-A licensed work?"  "Yes, as long
as the model is not a derivative of the work". 

Whether it's a derivative will probably depend on both the license, but more importantly on
what of the original work ends up in the model. 

> What are the licensing implications for statistical information drawn from non-ASL2-licensed
data, e.g. word frequency lists from Wikipedia dumps?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-90
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-90
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Steve Rowe
>
> I have generated word frequency lists from full Wikipedia dumps in several languages.
 For the purposes of inclusion in ASL2-licensed products, do I need to care about the license(s)
covering the original text?
> My interpretation (IANAL) of the [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported
license|http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode], under which [Wikipedia text
is licensed|http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use], is that the license applies
only to the Covered Works, Adaptations, and Collections, and that a word frequency list qualifies
as none of these: Adaptations are "recognizably derived from the original"; and Collections
"the Work is included in its entirety in unmodified form along with one or more other contributions".
> My interpretation of the answer to the resolved question ["Can Apache projects include
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike works?"|http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa]
is that even if the CC-SA license applies to my word frequency lists, I can still include
them in an ASL2-licensed product, as long as attribution is provided.
> I'm also interested in the more general question, as posed in the issue summary: do the
licenses covering arbitrary data, text or otherwise, have any bearing on stastical products
created over the data?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message