www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lawrence Rosen" <lro...@rosenlaw.com>
Subject RE: Proposal: Apache Third Party License Policy
Date Mon, 11 May 2015 03:44:25 GMT
Please don't insult, Brane. I'm not a troll. I am an elected member of Apache Software Foundation
and an experienced open source attorney. I'm not speaking for Apache, but I am speaking about
Apache. Nobody is required to agree with me.  But neither can YOU dictate a Third Party License
Policy that is unsuitable for MY Apache projects (whatever those may be). Somehow we need
to discuss Apache policy without personal attacks and learn to compromise based on logic.


If you don't like the GPL for some reason, then take that argument to YOUR Apache projects
and reach your own consensus. (Those who know me well realize that I'm not a GPL fan!) But
don't rely on the DRAFT Apache Third Party License Policy to prevent the rest of us from doing
what we find technically useful when our PMCs agree to it and we document it in our NOTICE


Isn't that in accord with The Apache Way?





From: Branko ─îibej [mailto:brane@apache.org] 
Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2015 7:54 PM
To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Apache Third Party License Policy


On 11.05.2015 04:35, Lawrence Rosen wrote:

Don't be scared, Brane. I'm not trying to get you or Apache involved in some lawsuit. If YOU
are afraid of the GPL, then don't incorporate such components in your projects. But don't
dictate a GPL policy for MY project.

That's so funny. So basically you're saying that your 3rd-party license policy was just a
troll. Thanks for sharing.

-- Brane

View raw message