Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18CA6182CE for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25139 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2015 07:23:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 24971 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2015 07:23:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 24959 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2015 07:23:38 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:23:38 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:23:38 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-81) Is it ok/meaningful to have a dependency licensed as ASL just for Apache Software Foundation, but LGPL for anyone else? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-81. ------------------------------ Resolution: Won't Fix Closing as ISIS-97 replaced this code. > Is it ok/meaningful to have a dependency licensed as ASL just for Apache Software Foundation, but LGPL for anyone else? > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-81 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-81 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Dan Haywood > > We are in the process of setting up Apache Isis into the incubator (the code prior to Apache being called the Naked Objects Framework and sister projects). > I've now realized that one of the modules has a small dependency on code that has an LGPL license (a small Javascript file) that would be part of the distribution. Since my understanding was that LGPL is not ASL 2 compatible, I contacted the developer about whether he might consider moving to ASL. His response was to grant permission as follows: > -begin- > Yes, I authorize "NO framework and your sister projects accepted [2] into the Apache incubator" to use my XMLHttpRequest.js library (available at the http://code.google.com/p/xmlhttprequest/ and currently licensed under LGPL) with the ASL license. > [2] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal. > -end- > So, my question is: is this sufficient for us? > Many thanks, > Dan Haywood -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org