www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Legal implications of how artefacts are named?
Date Thu, 23 Apr 2015 06:59:54 GMT
Hi all,

Maybe this has already been addressed before. If so I apologise for
reiterating the subject. Couldn't find anything pertaining the matter. See
below.

Is there, from a legal perspective, a limitation on how artefacts (e.g.
java packages) are named that are created/developed in our projects?

To be more specific: is it allowed to have an artefact, created by the
Apache Foo project, named as 'org.foo.artefact'? Or is it required to have
it named 'org.apache.foo.artefact'?

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>*
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

Mime
View raw message