Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 870AA10F4D for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46939 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2015 22:05:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 46774 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2015 22:05:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 46763 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2015 22:05:52 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:05:52 +0000 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:05:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-109) [POLICY] Resolve "Unmodifiable Standards" Exception MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Yandell closed LEGAL-109. ------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix > [POLICY] Resolve "Unmodifiable Standards" Exception > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-109 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-109 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin > Assignee: Robert Burrell Donkin > > ATM in "Previously Asked Questions"[1] (see below) an exception for small source documents unlikely to be modified is included in the weak-copyleft section but is missing from the no-modifications. I'm not clear that this was intentional, and understand that - in practice - projects already use the exception for reasonable licenses which do not allow modification. > I think it would be clearer to introduce a new category (category-s) which applies an exception to both weak-copyleft licenses and some no-modification licenses used by some standards bodies. > ------------------------------------------- > How should so-called "Weak Copyleft" Licenses be handled? > ... > For small amounts of source that is directly consumed by the ASF product at runtime > in source form, and for which that source is unmodified and unlikely to be changed > anyway (say, by virtue of being specified by a standard), inclusion of appropriately labeled > source is also permitted. An example of this is the web-facesconfig_1_0.dtd, whose > inclusion is mandated by the JSR 127: JavaServer Faces specification. > > How should licenses that prevent modification be handled?[3] > There are licenses that give broad rights for redistribution of unmodified copies. > Such licenses are not open source, but they do satisfy the second and third > guiding principles above. > Apache projects must not include material under such licenses in version control > or in released source packages. It is however acceptable for a build process to > automatically download such non-software materials like fonts and standardized data > and include them in the resulting binaries. Such use makes it clear that these > dependencies are not a part of the open source code of the project. > ------------------------------------------- > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > [2] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > [3] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#no-modification -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org