www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sandro Boehme (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-217) Use of npm with the Artistic License 2.0
Date Tue, 03 Mar 2015 23:05:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14345955#comment-14345955

Sandro Boehme commented on LEGAL-217:

I would like to add that the packages themself are usually MIT or Apache2 licensed and are
not a problem.
Maybe as npm is not checked in to SVN and is also not distributed also its license does not
apply to its packages in this case.

> Use of npm with the Artistic License 2.0 
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-217
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-217
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Sandro Boehme
> npm (Node.js package manager) uses the Artistic License 2.0 and I would like to use it
in the build process of an Apache Sling component. Would that be according to the ASF policies?
> Please see SLING-4463 and it's parent issue SLING-4462 for details.
> Thanks in advance,
> Sandro

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message