www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sandro Boehme <sandro.boe...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: Use of npm with the Artistic License 2.0
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:57:43 GMT
Hello,

this was a misunderstanding. In it's license npm refers to a package as 
a general software package. Not as an npm package in its registry.
See Ians explaination here:
http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/License-question-tt4047956.html#a4048702
Thanks for the feedback anyways!

Best,

Sandro

Am 12.03.15 um 23:40 schrieb Sandro Boehme:
> Hello,
>
> regarding LEGAL-217 [1] I wonder when an npm user actually agrees to
> distribute it's package under the npm license as well.
> Looking at the documentation [2] a package developer only calls 'npm
> publish' at his command line and it doesn't look like he agrees to let
> the npm license apply to his work. Before he is able to do that he has
> to add himself to as a user. I did that at the website and there I also
> did not agree to let the npm license apply to work I could publish with
> that account.
> I think I should ask for clarification from the npm team by describing
> my situation and ask them how they think their license should apply or not.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best,
>
> Sandro
>
> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-217
> [2] - https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/developers
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message