Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15D17173C3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97060 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2015 13:34:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 96911 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2015 13:34:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 96897 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2015 13:34:23 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:34:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.43.7] (fi-19-219-125.service.infuturo.it [151.19.219.125]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id BC3B91A01E4; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 13:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54C8E550.1000702@apache.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:34:08 +0100 From: Andrea Pescetti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: Apache Foundation position on copyleft licenses References: <1337483247.1194046.1422357107400.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <54C7872E.6050506@apache.org> <54C8A5E3.70704@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> <9E4C3493-ABAA-453A-96E9-97C9CB50854F@jaguNET.com> In-Reply-To: <9E4C3493-ABAA-453A-96E9-97C9CB50854F@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jim Jagielski wrote: > HOWEVER, the POV expressed does NOT reflect the POV of > the ASF itself, and so it must be *clearly* stated that > the page is the viewpoint either of the AOO PMC itself (and > only the PMC) or a specific individual. > Please make the required changes asap. I've added a disclaimer to the page, at the end of http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html It's not what you asked for, but it does clarify that the ASF does not necessarily endorse views expressed there. In this way it can stay even if the page is rewritten using a different tone (something I've proposed to do a long time ago, for the record). Deleting the page as suggested by Henri is not an option. That page has value for users who may legitimately wonder about differences with respect to proprietary and copyleft software respectively. Now, if the first result on search engines for "ASF position copyleft" led to a page where I could see what the ASF position is... I wonder why the e-mail was directed here. The OpenOffice PMC is able to fix its own website without a discussion on legal-discuss. Anyway, now that the disclaimer has been added, I see no value in continuing the legal-discuss thread. Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org