Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 952C411E64 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 00:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21551 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2014 00:37:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 21400 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2014 00:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 21389 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2014 00:37:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:37:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.49] (HELO mail-wg0-f49.google.com) (74.125.82.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:37:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id y10so11913001wgg.8 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:37:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KD1QpINhUS9VDraMCoEwMRfQwthCf3MCJmhnq3ThMDs=; b=bjgFfF1gfjv47rYLh3jQmSPtjH/jsI36j8lFKoEN9n7pqCQ3P903aldQtMfJbtO9pq l9lQLrTeGQRIoRpNWTPq7udDGiac1bBKzMy/ypPimgHhUN0RpEEOIka+JwEyfHY4GP0B CRLv3taJLkuoSz0MnAnBQDObbHH25TiyT/1p+OnHFODN2rj3W8wwBAq8w5ZtJl1bm4+D NPgagJLNz21If64kl1EMxvunsBc6DixINzvVtI88dX2MHS/WBVHaYYoWdXMo0yJH6Tsz mE56bydv+bvVV2xBMX7r3Kq8dMdv0QBpMv08RupXagf0j4U9wkkyeEVhuTf2+jkPzcgB qGLw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.8.102 with SMTP id q6mr1236731wja.74.1404347837250; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 17:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.108.199 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:37:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 01:37:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: transitive 3rd party dependencies From: sebb To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2 July 2014 23:21, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Christian M=C3=BCller > wrote: >> >> We do released the camel-infinispan component, but without the required >> dependencies. > > > No. You *released* camel-infinispan with the dependency. That's a problem= . > The fact that the dependency is not in the binary that you are distributi= ng > is somewhat irrelevant (better than containing the dependency), but does = not > negate the problem with your releases. That could be misinterpreted if taken out of context. Dependencies on prohibited items are allowed provided that the dependency is optional http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional > --kevan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org