Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF3E7110EC for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25742 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2014 11:10:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 25586 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2014 11:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 25575 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jul 2014 11:10:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:10:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pierre.smits@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.45] (HELO mail-wg0-f45.google.com) (74.125.82.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:10:29 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x12so869848wgg.28 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9twFyFgBkrMyjadyL7rhW8dm5gr9pcPPH6GcQs7L7ek=; b=Inunir8lVyyvK9/nrYM8atA1YGGhHNj8NY8r5OG+MGV6cFvtgHFenAzLk6kbP3kRiZ FjO/cHeDLMQykDBgAo2utp4lrBOIGqn+HJBL4TVEYy9JALPrlNBMb9yCd16sPCwUQ48f WFXbXMgrS/VZfqy0u6660LCQtZjPLs0y0rcTK5cv94ScS3I8CX3FKxYkryDRyFamdZTH y2YepzFKLLd7NIztSnH9Hlc7t1MYvcyV0b1AqHDJsqp4+6W0marnv16EjMpSIsvusaJd knJWg3OWKCj2rN3apHQ+ZyKJ9cOdJehwEq+NXBkgVArMxinD7XXAPgVEqQQY/g6UeQGt q+UQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.51 with SMTP id bt19mr35469503wjb.105.1405077001528; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.70.131 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:10:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7CC7DE5D-777F-43D7-A078-30626234C271@oracle.com> <1FC7940F-B6D0-466E-80E5-41C121C14E2C@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ASF Terms and Conditions From: Pierre Smits To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfd00668eec2004fde8fb5f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bfd00668eec2004fde8fb5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Rob, All, The iCLA is related to mailing lists. Mailing lists are the primary means of communication between community members of a ASF project, Foundation Members and Officers. Please read the terms of the iCLA again. While the iCLA states that the Work is the subject of the grant of copyright licence, it doesn't state that personal details are part of the Work. I doubt if that could be held up. Furthermore it is not about whether individuals should use the email equivalent of burner phones for participating in communications with other ASF community members, but whether the ASF is doing its utmost and the right thing regarding the personal information of its community members. The ASF is also bound by privacy laws and equivalents of data protection acts. Apart from that, communicating through such equivalent would surely hamper community building, personal relation building and more. Even without officially consent (e.g through submission of an iCLA) , community members can participate. Again, it is solicitated. Not enforced. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com --047d7bfd00668eec2004fde8fb5f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Rob, All,

The iCLA is related to mailin= g lists. Mailing lists are the primary means of communication between commu= nity members of a ASF project, Foundation Members and Officers. Please read= the terms of the iCLA again.

While the iCLA states that the Work is the subject of t= he grant of copyright licence, it doesn't state that personal details a= re part of the Work. I doubt if that could be held up.

Furthermore it is not about whether individuals should use the email e= quivalent of burner phones for participating in communications with other A= SF community members, but whether the ASF is doing its utmost and the right= thing regarding the personal information of its community members. The ASF= is also bound by privacy laws and equivalents of data protection acts.=C2= =A0
Apart from that, communicating through such equivalent would surely ha= mper community building, personal relation building and more.
Even without officially consent (e.g through submission of an i= CLA) , community members can participate. Again, it is solicitated. Not enf= orced.

Regards,


Pierre Smits

=
Services & Solutions for Cl= oud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
<= div> Services and Retail & Trade

--047d7bfd00668eec2004fde8fb5f--