www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: transitive 3rd party dependencies
Date Thu, 03 Jul 2014 00:37:17 GMT
On 2 July 2014 23:21, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Christian Müller
> <christian.mueller@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> We do released the camel-infinispan component, but without the required
>> dependencies.
>
>
> No. You *released* camel-infinispan with the dependency. That's a problem.
> The fact that the dependency is not in the binary that you are distributing
> is somewhat irrelevant (better than containing the dependency), but does not
> negate the problem with your releases.

That could be misinterpreted if taken out of context.
Dependencies on prohibited items are allowed provided that the
dependency is optional
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional

> --kevan
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message