www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Clarification about D&O insurance and bad acts
Date Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:39:50 GMT
Of course. I have specifically said that we should take
advantage of as many advances as possible. My point is
that there is a difference between what tools are used
and how/if they address the social implications behind
the process.
On Jun 2, 2014, at 5:53 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacretaz@apache.org> wrote:

> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> ...We have these policies in place because over the last ~19 years
>> (including pre-ASF days), they have proven to work...
> 
> The world of IT has changed in 19 years, including the tools that we
> use and the nature and shape of the software that we release.
> 
> While the root invariants of how we release software don't need to
> change, the *process* that we use to release can certainly be adapted
> to modern tools and practices like continuous integration, very
> frequent releases of very small modules, etc.
> 
> This requires going back to what the invariants that govern releases
> actually are, as opposed to fighting on the details of the actual
> release processes.
> 
> I have suggested a list of those invariants elsethread, at
> http://markmail.org/message/lal5ouukuoi5jvik
> 
> -Bertrand
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message