www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Question about ICLA
Date Sat, 21 Jun 2014 20:49:07 GMT
Which cases?

On Saturday, June 21, 2014, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Flavio,
>
> From ICLA:
> >> You represent that you are legally entitled to grant the above license.
>
> Intentions to grant are not sufficient in some cases. Maybe there are
> other differences as well.
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
> [1] Start using Apache Openmeetings today, http://openmeetings.apache.org/
> [2] Join Alexei Fedotov @linkedin, http://ru.linkedin.com/in/dataved/
> [3] Join Alexei Fedotov @facebook, http://www.facebook.com/openmeetings
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira
> <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've had this question before and I didn't get a clear answer, so I was
> > wondering what the answer really is. This page:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> >
> > says that it is desirable that all contributors sign an ICLA, being
> > mandatory only for committers. What does desirable mean precisely? I
> > interpret it as "good but not necessary". Also, this seems to imply that
> it
> > is the responsibility of a committer to clear up any IP issues when
> getting
> > code into the repository, and I assume that a contributor uploading a
> patch
> > to jira is a declaration of his/her intention to grant the code to ASF,
> > which isn't clear if it is enough.
> >
> > Is my interpretation correct?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Flavio
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> <javascript:;>
>
>

Mime
View raw message