www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Continuous release review
Date Mon, 02 Jun 2014 10:37:20 GMT
I've never said what criteria is required for someone
to vote a +1.

On Jun 1, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> On May 30, 2014, at 1:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com> wrote:
> 
>>> If I set up CI and it runs extended tests for an RC on 10 different platforms
>>> I don't have and I pore over the logs and doublecheck the checksums... I'd
>>> like to think most people would see that as "engaged" and "responsible".
>> 
>> Of course... I was simply turning the argument around as it were.
> 
> But apparently such a vote is unacceptable to you nonetheless, because the
> requirement to build and test each RC manually is sacrosanct -- no matter how
> effectively the social aspect is satisfied through other means.
> 
> I think that's unreasonable.  I have other priorities now, but at some point
> in the future, I'll submit a patch.
> 
> Marvin Humphrey
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message