Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D1D0100A0 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 17:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72312 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2014 17:40:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 71856 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2014 17:40:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 71819 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2014 17:39:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:39:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [69.163.253.135] (HELO homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com) (69.163.253.135) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:39:53 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590FF428078 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=gbiv.com; h=content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=gbiv.com; bh=a9sDdTR4NZI/Z1Sdp1pGXFUWs7A=; b=mLLOnDExw3OKPddSCuj/EHn484Kv O7bCOyAMj4Y3LiZ8E5YG6FOlQd5nyrVpxu95P25inlk0yljIbVkk/MjQZMPPsqEr s0nyLdjXmTr29lrnNN61MrA0mjZuFiX4+tRUoETI92kb65R+yYz0SSM0dLyYUp1T yaqBoq+d4ftOe0E= Received: from [192.168.1.84] (99-21-208-82.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [99.21.208.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fielding@gbiv.com) by homiemail-a71.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E879428014 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: LICENSE file question From: "Roy T. Fielding" In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:39:28 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7DF13B33-0FAB-4F6F-B4C6-2149FBFA618B@gbiv.com> References: <34a0d1dd0bf347208dd6c09e13f36ddf@BL2PR02MB500.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> To: legal-discuss@apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Apr 2, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Intermingling source files under multiple licenses is messy and not = ideal. In > general, Apache communities may only develop works under the Apache = License. Er, no -- we can develop works under any license. We just have to be able to distribute our Apache products under the Apache License. We frequently make changes to BSD works and include those changes under the BSD when redistributed. We also frequently develop works that are under non-compatible licenses if we intend to send them upstream for some other org to distribute; autoconf stuff is one such example. ....Roy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org