Return-Path: 
 <legal-discuss-return-9347-apmail-legal-discuss-archive=apache.org@apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD5B110A80
	for <apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  3 Mar 2014 02:56:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 39375 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2014 02:56:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org
Received: (qmail 38837 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2014 02:56:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:legal-discuss-help@apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:legal-discuss@apache.org>
Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org
List-Id: <legal-discuss.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org
Delivered-To: moderator for legal-discuss@apache.org
Received: (qmail 22510 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2014 19:01:07 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=iWRLAyxrJd14EX1DPtUCNmdcm6jO180EAm1l1dqwMQ4=;
        b=Fzvd68YRelAO/cUB7VPIblGAUhINftspKeDY5o+5ShB/bHv4WJBIa5TYlrVgszDTfu
         SbCApFM1t7v9XgpH8ayPkVj32AfgTN77Jw6JT3ARkmNPilxmJmTkTvpEb9nAW9fXYFk7
         Ao8VAiHUZCU57fx8h0dRtM4vOK8dKbkuIngTY/rAN4s7z+ySTpNVBncewCJs9fbyLgYi
         jQIWXhsqdJqzK4KZ4SVGkj6No1lE33OZhvebb/7F621GzFYB77EjL2Dms0CHv45XXXfx
         AtUGgIOE2JjVPBc1wTQOdPhUEWnBYZsfCG+m8CUCr4cUOGz0qYSdD/cGpcS4tVIKLzi5
         Msgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQngaOCBL9hU3AEza6dQpCqFOO9c6DzR0oGsiWtNA24mrW4RC0HnaoGFToix3CxrQaL952St
X-Received: by 10.68.107.193 with SMTP id he1mr3029868pbb.102.1393700441231;
 Sat, 01 Mar 2014 11:00:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Brian McCallister <brianm@skife.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 11:00:00 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAKKdvLtkyb_Z_3JzTP8ob0QPy5V18jjiTZpwoGnUm57qtosC3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: License Footer
To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

So I know license *headers* are the norm, but is there any reason
other than convention to prefer a header to a footer?

-Brian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org