Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA67C10B16 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 22:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39679 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2014 22:11:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 39498 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2014 22:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 39491 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2014 22:11:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:11:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [132.250.34.42] (HELO SpaceCAS.spacenet.nrl.navy.mil) (132.250.34.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 22:11:17 +0000 Received: from [132.250.30.204] (132.250.30.204) by SpaceCAS.nrl.navy.mil (132.250.34.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:10:55 -0500 Message-ID: <5318F26F.10109@nrl.navy.mil> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 17:10:55 -0500 From: Evan Ward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: "private@commons.apache.org" Subject: Re: ICLA US Government References: <531792EA.7080409@nrl.navy.mil> <388610E4-31F6-4F3D-A45B-C0CCE2E4C8DC@jaguNET.com> <40489573.15098609.1394138791060.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <5318E665.2050209@nrl.navy.mil> <676734696.15118170.1394141552754.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [132.250.30.204] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The helpful lawyers here have informed me that I don't have the authority to make the agreements spelled out in the original ICLA. I think signing it would be dishonest, both towards Apache and my employer. If Apache is unwilling to negotiate or accept a modified ICLA, then we are out of options. To be clear, I would be happy to sign the original ICLA if it excluded the work produced from my official government duties. As long as Apache still accepts work in the public domain I will continue to make contributions to [math]. A future thank you to those who commit my patches. Cheers, Evan On Thu 06 Mar 2014 04:34:47 PM EST, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: > > +1 that is very much my understanding as well. > > > Cheers, > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Fontana > Reply-To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" > Date: Thursday, March 6, 2014 1:32 PM > To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" > Cc: "private@commons.apache.org" > Subject: Re: ICLA US Government > >> >> I'd redraft that section 2. In any case I understand the longstanding ASF >> policy is 'use our standard CLAs, no special cases'. >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> I got into programming for the tricky logic problems. Look like I should >>> have been a lawyer. :) >>> >>> For another open source project that uses the Apache License and ICLAs, >>> I joined using a modified ICLA (attached). If we s/CS/Apache/ and >>> s/Orekit/Commons/ would it be acceptable? I think it clears up the >>> worldwide issue and explicitly states "public domain with no license". >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Evan >>> >>> On Thu 06 Mar 2014 03:46:31 PM EST, Richard Fontana wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> But the point is that US government works for which copyright is >>>> excluded domestically may not have the same exclusion as to copies of >>>> those same works published in other countries. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> True, but public domain is a concept in all modern copyright systems. >>>> >>>> Moral right treatments differ, but I don't think that the Apache >>>> ICLA addresses that anyway. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Jim Jagielski >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>> We also need to recall that US Copyright Law is not the >>>> sole one in existence ;) >>>> >>>> On Mar 6, 2014, at 2:36 AM, Ted Dunning >>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You may not be the copyright owner, but you can grant a >>>> >>>> license to public domain works. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As can I or anyone else. >>>>> >>>>> The fact that the the licensee doesn't need the license is >>>> >>>> irrelevant. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org