www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig L Russell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-195) Java Advanced Imaging and Maven
Date Mon, 10 Mar 2014 18:57:44 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13926046#comment-13926046

Craig L Russell commented on LEGAL-195:

IMHO this usage falls into the exceptions category. As long as the JAI is not distributed
and is not needed for "normal use" of the project, it's ok to have a maven dependency for

> Java Advanced Imaging and Maven
> -------------------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-195
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-195
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: John Hewson
> Java Advanced Imaging is under the Binary Code License which is prohibited for use in
Apache projects: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited
> But can we use JAI as a dependency via Maven?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message