www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: License Footer
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2014 15:52:08 GMT
My IDE auto hides any comments at the top of the file, so I argue that I
don't see any license headers.

Ignorance is no defence in the eyes of the law... but it could be a
mitigating factor against the level of punishment!


On 3 March 2014 15:45, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> IANAL, but my company's legal team has advised us to put legal stuff
> before content so it makes it harder for someone to argue that they didn't
> see the legal stuff.
>
> On 3/3/14 4:36 AM, "James Carman" <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> >I would think they'd be more obvious to the reader/user.
> >
> >On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Brian McCallister <brianm@skife.org>
> >wrote:
> >> So I know license *headers* are the norm, but is there any reason
> >> other than convention to prefer a header to a footer?
> >>
> >> -Brian
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >>
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message