www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-192) Why is LGPL not allowed
Date Sat, 22 Feb 2014 22:03:40 GMT
I can say from from personal experience that it is categorically untrue that all commercial
software of note contains both kinds of licenses. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 22, 2014, at 9:23, "Lawrence Rosen (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> But I suggested, as a factual matter, that *all* commercial software of note nowadays
includes *both* Apache components *and* LGPL components. Treating these licenses as parts
of separate and incompatible FOSS ecosystems is no longer appropriate in the commercial software
world.
> 
> In other words, whether or not Apache policy allows the combination of Apache and LGPL
works, commercial software does it all the time!
> 
> Am I right or wrong?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message