Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5437410F21 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6265 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2013 12:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 6037 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2013 12:55:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 6019 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2013 12:55:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:55:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [76.96.27.228] (HELO qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.27.228) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:55:36 +0000 Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xQsk1m0041vN32cAFQv829; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:55:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.80.74]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id xQvC1m00U1cCKD98iQvEj9; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 12:55:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-185) Classify 3-clause BSD ("simplified BSD") From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 07:55:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <63545C33-0FE7-4EFC-864B-0DD5B975DD77@jaguNET.com> References: <529E41A1.2000900@apache.org> To: "legal-discuss@apache.org Discuss" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1386161708; bh=Beqz/6wMqMRqf561tH/Ela7TCTzFzMLWidTUk36mq2A=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=Q34JsGY/QP5xr0/zF4xBPYt7luUwCPmI5CvDmwUV40v5WTnaDbLP3p8oJio+lftCz z+MbnrKljsTMuPU+mlG4T59OPDPpbzjIdGZGyNsUSr/D3S6rn7vBiDx+chwoOb0OJp WxjCq0Lu8bINKqVSTDNUZN2eievtPaGPT/Gphltpvbi3tdYZhkDJ2G4l880WgIRFAE dNFz+D80kR/kOkG52yT579Xs+nbZlUBg0EOhDqoCjc1md7i4en+D4pWQC9/cwgSdOP 7+5XShsUGIq2JLokUjFPNqUGasCBpjOTfgcxigCy5OO5tc1a3bHj9EBp8h+3OI0GYu f81/QXPyv+hRA== X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org This is indeed the case. The issue is that the URL just points, as RF indicates, to the 2-clause version. Both the 3 and 2 clause versions are Cat-A. On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > Thanks, but I don't see that information as relevant to the question > I'm asking. I'm not asking about the library, or even asking what the > license is. I'm asking Apache Legal Affairs what the classification > of that license is. >=20 > I agree with that. I believe the intent was for 2-clause and 3-clause = BSD to be category-a. Would be nice if somebody could search the mailing = list archives for proof of this. Barring this, I'd give a little time = for dissenting opinions to be registered... >=20 > --kevan=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > --kevan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org