On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:55 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
This is indeed the case. The issue is that the URL just
points, as RF indicates, to the 2-clause version. Both
the 3 and 2 clause versions are Cat-A.

I think we all agree. While we're at it, the link to the DOM4J license should also be updated. This is the license it's meant to be referring to: http://dom4j.sourceforge.net/dom4j-1.6.1/license.html 

I couldn't find the license on the dom4j.org site...