On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Luis Villa wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:51:33PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Shane Curcuru >> wrote: >> > >> > Personally I find it extraordinarily unlikely that the ASF will add >> current >> > CC-* licenses to category A >> > >> > >> > As a point of information, CC BY 2.5 and 3.0 are already in Category A. >> >> Ah, so they are. >> >> (So what has this debate been all about then?) >> > > If you assume they were correctly added to Category A, then there really > is no debate: 4.0 should be in there as well. > > I simply think that, based on what I know of the criteria for Category A, > and what the embedded device/media-handling device world assumes about > Apache software, the addition of 2.5/3.0 to Category A was in error. > Which, to be clear, is not a condemnation of CC; lots of fine licenses, including the one I wrote, aren't in Category A. :) Luis > Luis > > >> - RF >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> >> >