www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net>
Subject Re: New versions of CC licenses
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:53:27 GMT
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that the structure of phrasing and document structure makes
> it crystal clear that 2.a.5.A and 2.a.5.B are referring to one and the same
> thing, namely the implicit offer from the original Licensor of Licensed
> Rights to any downstream recipient irrespective of any 3rd party license
> agreements that were involved in the downstream recipient becoming a
> downstream recipient.

How does this work if the content in question is modified by either the ASF
or by the licensee?

Quoting from Category B[1] "...and for which that source is unmodified and
unlikely to be changed anyway..."

- Sam Ruby

[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b

View raw message