www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: New versions of CC licenses
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:59:38 GMT
On 9 December 2013 16:48, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> But don't exclude the virtues of the CC-BY license (for some licensors!)
>> simply because you didn't consider all possible attribution mechanisms when
>> you entered private deals with your customers.
>>
>>
> Can we please refrain from putting words in other people's mouths?  It is
> bad enough that you made a public accusation without any evidence.  I
> suggest that we stick to actual concerns that have been expressed, and not
> invent strawmen.
>

But I thought that was just how Larry roles...

Oh well...

;-)


>
> What I have seen is Louis expressing concern over "an anti-DRM provision",
> and Jeff expressing concern over "carrying forward the CC license terms
> verbatim in the user's license to its customer".
>
> Can anybody else cite any other concerns expressed over the use of this
> license within the context of the packages released by ASF PMCs?
>
> - Sam Ruby
>

Mime
View raw message