www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: New versions of CC licenses
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:06:53 GMT

On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Jeffrey Thompson <jthom@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> You're explicitly contradicting yourself.  AL2.0 expressly says one can license "the
Derivative Work as a whole" under their own terms, not "the Derivative Work as a collection
under your own terms with the Work being licensed under AL2.0".

The intent though is that people should know that inside that  larger work
is some ALv2 licensed code that, no matter what the license of
the larger work as a whole is under, and that they can have access to it
(the bits) and such access is under ALv2.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message