www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: New versions of CC licenses
Date Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:06:53 GMT

On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Jeffrey Thompson <jthom@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> You're explicitly contradicting yourself.  AL2.0 expressly says one can license "the
Derivative Work as a whole" under their own terms, not "the Derivative Work as a collection
under your own terms with the Work being licensed under AL2.0".
> 

The intent though is that people should know that inside that  larger work
is some ALv2 licensed code that, no matter what the license of
the larger work as a whole is under, and that they can have access to it
(the bits) and such access is under ALv2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message