www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-185) Classify 3-clause BSD ("simplified BSD")
Date Thu, 05 Dec 2013 11:25:07 GMT
FWIW, even the old 4-clause is Cat-A as well.

On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:03 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Rob Weir <robweir@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks, but I don't see that information as relevant to the question
> I'm asking.  I'm not asking about the library, or even asking what the
> license is.  I'm asking Apache Legal Affairs what the classification
> of that license is.
> 
> I agree with that. I believe the intent was for 2-clause and 3-clause BSD to be category-a.
Would be nice if somebody could search the mailing list archives for proof of this. Barring
this, I'd give a little time for dissenting opinions to be registered...
> 
> --kevan 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --kevan


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message