Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBB0E103E0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78175 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2013 02:11:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 77972 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2013 02:10:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 77965 invoked by uid 99); 12 Nov 2013 02:10:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:10:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hyandell@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.48] (HELO mail-qa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.216.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:10:54 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w8so2496712qac.0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:10:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zgxrtviMqhJxUDgfW5DhXsqJB2J23snTbCGYk5+qBTw=; b=s5C4N/Am/hGMhFhZ6DEdg+ERSyTU/ySUxiDYBd6DqsaFkw/IrucWOP2R3f+X5spPia LQFBQLQXU4JnPQId6vA22qN5eLaYtQ797nNx/Iffuxq8+BfKo4lCvAjJX0LyHkJoMdKw JvU67+Mm0mirGIlTkPNgw5WQy9tBmIAv1Yb377x3F4sl8tg9VbfF0p7KvPHbIeKnNGpL Ftedxr0S4Z+2/sVnJBaj5izcxBwSV8Gb3E8S3HGWPG6nWHh5Sa1sc3b4SF4K37Eh/lPC pEV9/G4VQ1FYkLc/Nj1lykA0A7Ca8A5FGrJx1AHqm37JruEX0uy73KNgPYlJN4jUzsPF 0Isw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.39.201 with SMTP id r9mr29363039qek.46.1384222234114; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:10:34 -0800 (PST) Sender: hyandell@gmail.com Received: by 10.96.161.226 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:10:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7D2E3781-4B42-43C6-93AE-31AACF804373@yahoo.com> References: <7D2E3781-4B42-43C6-93AE-31AACF804373@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:10:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jhaVrGdh_urwx9pF4rfwXnOgLIM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Closing LEGAL-182 From: Henri Yandell To: Joseph Schaefer Cc: "legal-discuss@apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea33be8e017d04eaf15aad X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7bea33be8e017d04eaf15aad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Craig said "this usage", so I'd presume for one project to use it in one (defined in ticket) way. Hen On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Joseph Schaefer w= rote: > Well you got what you wanted but I'm not sure what it actually means. Is > this a carve out for a specific use case: as part of a project's desire t= o > ship data in a test suite, or a more general ruling on the merits of the > license alone, in which case what category does it belong in? > > Good luck ferreting that out. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > I'm not on the other list. I was liking the request for the issue to be > resolved. i.e. non binding +1. > > Hen > > On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Joseph Schaefer wrote: > >> What=92s to like? The dishonesty about how release >> votes are counted? Or the pleas to arm ant with >> more finger-wagging authority? >> >> >> Please. Release votes were never required to be >> unanimous. If a simple majority approve of it, >> the release passes. If not, browbeating the opposition >> into submission by overruling them is discourteous >> at best and not likely to garner an affirmative >> vote out of them, so why does this need to be >> settled immediately by a policy ruling rather than >> by simple majority on a one-time basis? >> >> >> On Nov 9, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >> > The more I use social apps, the more I want to say 'Like' on email :) >> > >> > *Like* >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, ant elder wrote= : >> > Dear Legal Affairs people, >> > >> > LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open. >> > >> > VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using >> > the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC >> > pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed. >> > >> > Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to >> > help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the >> > new release work? >> > >> > TIA, >> > >> > ...ant >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org >> >> --047d7bea33be8e017d04eaf15aad Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Craig said "this usage", so I'd presume for = one project to use it in one (defined in ticket) way.

Hen


On Sun, Nov 10, 20= 13 at 12:27 AM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well you got what you= wanted but I'm not sure what it actually means. =A0Is this a carve out= for a specific use case: as part of a project's desire to ship data in= a test suite, or a more general ruling on the merits of the license alone,= in which case what category does it belong in?

Good luck ferreting that out.

Sent from my iPhon= e

On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Henri Ya= ndell <henri@yand= ell.org> wrote:

I'm not on the other list. I w= as liking the request for the issue to be resolved. i.e. non binding<= /span>=A0+1.

Hen

On Saturday, November 9, 20= 13, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
What=92s to like? =A0The dishonesty about how release
votes are counted? =A0Or the pleas to arm ant with
more finger-wagging authority?


Please. =A0Release votes were never required to be
unanimous. =A0If a simple majority approve of it,
the release passes. =A0If not, browbeating the opposition
into submission by overruling them is discourteous
at best and not likely to garner an affirmative
vote out of them, so why does this need to be
settled immediately by a policy ruling rather than
by simple majority on a one-time basis?


On Nov 9, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org> = wrote:

> The more I use social apps, the more I want to say 'Like' on e= mail :)
>
> *Like*
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com<= /a>> wrote:
> Dear Legal Affairs people,
>
> LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open.
>
> VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using > the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC
> pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed.
>
> Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to
> help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the > new release work?
>
> TIA,
>
> =A0 ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------<= br> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org<= br> >
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


--047d7bea33be8e017d04eaf15aad--