www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <he...@yandell.org>
Subject Re: Closing LEGAL-182
Date Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:10:34 GMT
Craig said "this usage", so I'd presume for one project to use it in one
(defined in ticket) way.

Hen


On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schaefer@yahoo.com>wrote:

> Well you got what you wanted but I'm not sure what it actually means.  Is
> this a carve out for a specific use case: as part of a project's desire to
> ship data in a test suite, or a more general ruling on the merits of the
> license alone, in which case what category does it belong in?
>
> Good luck ferreting that out.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org> wrote:
>
> I'm not on the other list. I was liking the request for the issue to be
> resolved. i.e. non binding +1.
>
> Hen
>
> On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
>
>> What’s to like?  The dishonesty about how release
>> votes are counted?  Or the pleas to arm ant with
>> more finger-wagging authority?
>>
>>
>> Please.  Release votes were never required to be
>> unanimous.  If a simple majority approve of it,
>> the release passes.  If not, browbeating the opposition
>> into submission by overruling them is discourteous
>> at best and not likely to garner an affirmative
>> vote out of them, so why does this need to be
>> settled immediately by a policy ruling rather than
>> by simple majority on a one-time basis?
>>
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org> wrote:
>>
>> > The more I use social apps, the more I want to say 'Like' on email :)
>> >
>> > *Like*
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear Legal Affairs people,
>> >
>> > LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open.
>> >
>> > VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using
>> > the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC
>> > pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed.
>> >
>> > Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to
>> > help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the
>> > new release work?
>> >
>> > TIA,
>> >
>> >   ...ant
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>>

Mime
View raw message