Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E54F100E3 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1881 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2013 15:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 1750 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2013 15:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 1743 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2013 15:00:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:00:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of santiago.gala@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.51] (HELO mail-oa0-f51.google.com) (209.85.219.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:00:53 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i4so7877781oah.24 for ; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:00:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KW+SG1gnkgpsaMn/Tpuei/cRBknqMpc4+uBfnePh1E4=; b=AqK7yQ/dd3w4Zct8ZR7OuC2POV13a/STaVxMKrZ+pOthToi6ceNCRZYEY8SpvAcQea xNyZUuLV9co3kUqIMiHUY/AeRBNPGHK9LvyIxAhI3JwPGw35p4vp5W0rXG0SG3RhTGvH /3jxLEStNusoedXQexqChvlvn7OEAuAlYU1Qa38LFqQ3DFVa7YuOEc6QDSRqBKJ2+Pvl L5CIc+sGPxSEL6yzrE2uso/5jwBLj9cX7O/zVrXcie6vLKH8S2MMFCUqEP09GNmmRt2A FTICIsPUQUHmVUltfYiLu09f62zalWt28WhWFqJSL7O5g2xFmeq1tc98rE03UNLHNksH LW6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.128.103 with SMTP id nn7mr17693609obb.104.1374418832999; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.125.226 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <51E6EC7C.1070101@intertwingly.net> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Require a copyright notice in source headers From: Santiago Gala To: legal-discuss Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1cf1a504d7a04e206d219 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8ff1cf1a504d7a04e206d219 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > [x] -1 Retain existing policy, discouraging copyright notices > outside of the NOTICE file > non-binding -1 (i.e. retain existing policy) My reasoning is that we try to simplify life for developers/integrators, and we keep a good balance between tracking effort and boilerplate for most risk assessments I've seen. Regards Santiago > > - Sam Ruby > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > --e89a8ff1cf1a504d7a04e206d219 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
[x] -1 Retain existing policy, discouraging = copyright notices
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 outside of the NOTICE file

non-binding -1 (i.e. retain existin= g policy)

My reasoning is that we try to simplify = life for developers/integrators, and we keep a good balance between trackin= g effort and boilerplate for most risk assessments I've seen.

Regards=C2=A0
Santiago
=C2=A0
=

- Sam Ruby

-----------------------------= ----------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-= unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@= apache.org


--e89a8ff1cf1a504d7a04e206d219--