www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kevan Miller <kevan.mil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: How should we license a Git repository we don't make releases from?
Date Sun, 21 Jul 2013 00:37:24 GMT

On Jul 16, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> CouchDB has the following admin Git repository:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb-admin.git;a=tree
> 
> We do not make releases from this repository. In fact, one of its primary purposes is
to assist in making releases from our main repository. Heh.
> 
> How should we handle the licensing and copyright attribution?
> 
> At the moment, I am:
> 
>  * Including the standard boilerplate in all files where it makes sense
>  * Included a top level NOTICE
>  * Included a top level LICENSE

Hi Noah,
IMO, that's correct. I certainly don't see anything wrong with it… Also, you may not plan
on releasing the code, but that plan might change in the future… 

--kevan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message