Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64DFF10042 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82492 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2013 04:46:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 81719 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2013 04:46:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 81290 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2013 04:46:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:46:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:46:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-135) Is the WTFPL license acceptable MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13684970#comment-13684970 ] Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-135: ------------------------------------- Any reason not to consider it covered by 'Can Works Placed In The Public Domain Be Included In Apache Products?' ? Weak and horrible as the license text is, it seems fair to consider it a public domain license. > Is the WTFPL license acceptable > ------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-135 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: David Nalley > > Apache CloudStack (incubating) is trying to vet all of the bundled libraries and dependencies. One such library is jquery.times [1], which is released under the WTFPL [2], which we'd like to continue using. I suppose that we could perform an end run around this issue and merely re-license the software as that appears to be explicitly permitted, but that seems a bit squirrely. > [1] http://archive.plugins.jquery.com/node/3656/release > [2] http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org