www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andreas Lehmkühler (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-163) Are "Ubuntu License 1.0" licensed fonts allowed in the repo
Date Sun, 05 May 2013 17:56:16 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Andreas Lehmkühler closed LEGAL-163.
------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

So to sum this up:

- the ubuntu license 1.0 has a weak copyleft and therefore is a "Category B" license, see
http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
- we must not put those fonts into our repo
- we must not ship such fonts as part of our source tar ball

Thanks to all for the input and the clarification.

                
> Are "Ubuntu License 1.0" licensed fonts allowed in the repo
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-163
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-163
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Andreas Lehmkühler
>
> We like to include some ubuntu fonts in our testsuite. They are licensed using the "Ubuntu
License 1.0" [1].  
> I'm not a license expert, but it looks ok to me. WDYT? Is it ok to add those as test
resources to out svn repository? Is it ok to ship them as part of the source tarball?
> [1] http://font.ubuntu.com/licence/
> TIA

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message