www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Fwd: Is "SIL Open Font License" compatible with AL?
Date Thu, 30 May 2013 01:17:50 GMT
Thanks!


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Alexei Fedotov
<alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>wrote:

> AFAIR
> We can use it, we should get the compiled version during the build process
> from their web site instead of keeping in our svn.
> 29.05.2013 20:33 пользователь "Kevan Miller" <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> написал:
>
> > FYI
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > *From: *Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org>
> > *Subject: **Re: Is "SIL Open Font License" compatible with AL?*
> > *Date: *May 27, 2013 1:05:41 PM EDT
> > *To: *ASF Legal Discuss <legal-discuss@apache.org>
> > *Reply-To: *legal-discuss@apache.org
> >
> > See: http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Legal Team,
> >>
> >> Could you please tell me if "*SIL Open Font License*" [1] compatible
> >> with AL?
> >> I would like to include one of this fonts into Apache Openmeetings
> product
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance
> >>
> >> [1] The Font Awesome font is licensed under the *SIL Open Font License*-
> >> http://scripts.sil.org/OFL
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Mime
View raw message