Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84EBEF4AF for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69674 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2013 17:30:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 68803 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2013 17:30:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 68398 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2013 17:30:16 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:30:16 +0000 Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) From: "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-163) Are "Ubuntu License 1.0" licensed fonts allowed in the repo MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-163?page=3Dcom.atlassian.= jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=3D13631= 358#comment-13631358 ]=20 Henri Yandell commented on LEGAL-163: ------------------------------------- Fonts are an interesting space license wise, terms around 'don't change the= name' and 'change the name if modified' are normal. Ubuntu's is copyleft (source, build files etc), but the fonts of the Ubuntu= license are weak copyleft. Presuming fonts to be 'binary', could the font = files of an Ubuntu font licensed project be considered category B? =20 > Are "Ubuntu License 1.0" licensed fonts allowed in the repo > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-163 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-163 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Andreas Lehmk=C3=BChler > > We like to include some ubuntu fonts in our testsuite. They are licensed = using the "Ubuntu License 1.0" [1]. =20 > I'm not a license expert, but it looks ok to me. WDYT? Is it ok to add th= ose as test resources to out svn repository? Is it ok to ship them as part = of the source tarball? > [1] http://font.ubuntu.com/licence/ > TIA -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrato= rs For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org