www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Joseph Masanz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-157) May we include models without release the data the models were built from
Date Wed, 23 Jan 2013 22:35:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13561177#comment-13561177
] 

James Joseph Masanz commented on LEGAL-157:
-------------------------------------------


Does the same apply to a (convenience) binary?

Also, just for my education, is Roy's definition of "source"  on an openly archived email
list for my future reference so I don't make the same mistake with something else I mistakenly
believe to be source? or could you paste it here? thanks.

                
> May we include models without release the data the models were built from
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-157
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-157
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: James Joseph Masanz
>
> We would like to include with cTAKES machine learning models built from data that is
not publicly available.
> The models are contributed to Apache.
> The corpus of data used to build the models is not contributed to Apache.
> Can we include such models in a convenience binary?
> http://s.apache.org/cTAKES-models-Q012013
> - James Masanz

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message