www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Prashant Shah <pshah.mum...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Modifying license for personal use
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:33:35 GMT
Hi,

> No, it is not better than the original.  The Apache license
> terms are based on actual things controlled by copyright (this clause)
> and patents (the clause after this).  The MIT license is just a jumble
> of vague permissions that only cover a subset of both.

Thanks for your input - it was very helpful.

One last thing, in the "Redistribution." clause is it ok to remove the
sub-sections 1, 2, & 4 ?

------------------------------
4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work
or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without
modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You meet
the following conditions:

   1. You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative
Works a copy of this License; and

   2. You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that You changed the files; and

   3. You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that
You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution
notices from the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that
do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works; and

   4. If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its
distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must
include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained within
such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not pertain to any
part of the ...

Regards.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message