Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 827CBE88F for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4333 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2012 23:56:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 3874 invoked by uid 500); 21 Nov 2012 23:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 3844 invoked by uid 99); 21 Nov 2012 23:56:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:56:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.50] (HELO mail-ee0-f50.google.com) (74.125.83.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 23:56:06 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id b45so3984707eek.23 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:55:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=6jFuDoSdZ6rlqFmvGr0e3efgGhVUaN7xAFQindZawaU=; b=il7+UHgrU05iHFXXbETgOIXFgPMJw8S8pEwEWin5EmiFJKkCkpTJAUGq3sH1vX9eWT hbfEZD0WQSqKkHfAP+Z1WuQnBrnHcBb59PnVrZ4MaOTFw25I9lvZHQ9Ri/+4iKO4yYCT +aHyHrVWcqcScaW4bGlEZfoqztGTILCcgtMXfVuePbXmzENkoa3AeKwZTgKwoOhXLyiZ 1a/ct+9CiUZrsMmb9/IFtWx0pyrMiNr7LzrJl2hhV0ZB6kPRdoYR3ks0A2c1MR70oryL vUJQbDmcqBdRoC5dWHBhhFFJtlrfP6qJ2xtVhQhJ2guZxFaPLSvu5BjTv3hjO6rdwYek jEWQ== Received: by 10.14.211.135 with SMTP id w7mr43058875eeo.4.1353542145658; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:55:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.74.89 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:55:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50ACF2C2.7090301@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:55:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Customer reference in NOTICE To: legal-discuss@apache.org, mllist@mvdb.net Cc: syncope-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b624940c7cf6904cf0a16da X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b624940c7cf6904cf0a16da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Presumably the company required that the person doing the work commit this work or cause this work to be committed to the project. That seems like the person agreeing to this is crossing their wires a bit since Apache contribution is supposed to be on an individual level (although there are plenty of examples of partisanship masquerading as personal initiative). On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > How is possible that a company requires the ASF to put it in the source > repository. Isn't this a community decision ? > --047d7b624940c7cf6904cf0a16da Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Presumably the company required that the person doing the work commit this = work or cause this work to be committed to the project. =C2=A0That seems li= ke the person agreeing to this is crossing their wires a bit since Apache c= ontribution is supposed to be on an individual level (although there are pl= enty of examples of partisanship masquerading as personal initiative).

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Martin van = den Bemt <mllist@mvdb.net> wrote:
How is possible that a company requires the ASF to put it = in the source repository. Isn't this a community decision ?

--047d7b624940c7cf6904cf0a16da--