www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com>
Subject Re: short file short notices
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:03:57 GMT

On Oct 31, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:

> Only one problem. Virtually nothing is 'Copyright Apache Software
> Foundation'. We don't ask people for copyright assignment.

I'm sure Larry will comment, but

Apache do copyright the work as a whole. We do not accept copyright  
assignments, but what we ship (releases) is copyright Apache.

Please see http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice for  
more information.

Craig
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Lawrence Rosen  
> <lrosen@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
>> David Crossley wrote:
>>> Could we also not have the Year if possible?
>>
>> When you publish with a copyright notice, insert the current year  
>> as the
>> "year of first publication". As an example of legal foolishness, a  
>> copyright
>> notice isn't required, but if you have one the format is generally
>> prescribed by copyright law. See 17 USC ยง401.
>>
>> /Larry
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Crossley [mailto:crossley@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:26 PM
>> To: legal-discuss@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: short file short notices
>>
>> Lawrence Rosen wrote:
>>> Someone quoted:
>>>>
>>>> (Personally, I don't see why Craig's short header[1] stating simply
>>>> "Licensed under the terms of
>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0" does not suffice for
>>>> everything we do.  But IANAL, etc...)
>>>
>>> Suffice for what purpose? No notices are *required* to comply with
>> copyright or licensing law, but for the purpose of notifying  
>> recipients of
>> the origin and availability of a file, I suggest the following two- 
>> line
>> minimum notice:
>>>
>>>     Copyright (C) 2012 The Apache Software Foundation.
>>>     Licensed under the terms of the
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.
>>>
>>> Even that, though, is merely a nice-to-have, and so we shouldn't  
>>> care
>>> that it is moved in some cases to the bottom rather than the top  
>>> of a
>>> file. Or even omitted entirely for files shorter than 2 lines. :-)
>>
>> Thanks for the clear and complete answer Larry.
>> Please remove the fly-speck at the end of the URL.
>> Could we also not have the Year if possible?
>>
>> -David
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:48 AM
>>> To: legal-discuss@apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: short file short notices
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com

>>> >
>> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Craig L Russell
>>>> <craig.russell@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, there are quite a bit of how-to files that will need to
>>>>> change, and I think it would be good if there were a policy that
>> justifies it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise, we run the risk of getting some bit wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm +1 to make the change.
>>>>
>>>> If we finally get a "short header" approved, will that render this
>>>> "license footer" proposal obsolete?  It seems sub-optimal to update
>>>> those how-to files once, then update them again.
>>>>
>>>> (Personally, I don't see why Craig's short header[1] stating simply
>>>> "Licensed under the terms of
>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0" does not suffice for
>>>> everything we do.  But IANAL, etc...)
>>>
>>> As I understand how things happen in the legal arena around here ...
>>>
>>> To get a short header policy approved, someone has to say, "Here  
>>> is my
>> practical problem on my TLP that would be solved by short headers  
>> (and is
>> not solved by the rules that exclude some things from copyright
>> altogether)". Any number of us who think it would be a good thing  
>> in theory,
>> but who don't represent an actual practical problem, won't cut it.
>>>
>>> So, the question is, do any of the authors of these JIRA fill the  
>>> bill?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marvin Humphrey
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/WHK (link to comment on legal JIRA-124)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>

Craig L Russell
Architect, Oracle
http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message