I'm guessing it is simply that nobody has updated the web page. I gotta
believe MPL 2.0 would be just fine.
Cheers,
-g
On Aug 10, 2012 5:11 PM, "Richard Fontana" <rfontana@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just noticed that at <http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html> in
> the list of "licenses may be included in binary form within an Apache
> product if the inclusion is appropriately labeled" there is a list
> that includes MPL 1.0 and MPL 1.1 but not MPL 2.0 [1]. What is ASF's
> policy on MPL 2.0? (Perhaps the issue just hasn't come up yet?)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
> [1] http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
|