Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F846C03A for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38815 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2012 15:20:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 38628 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2012 15:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 38614 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2012 15:20:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:20:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.120.123.130] (HELO neghvar.compsoc.com) (193.120.123.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 15:20:01 +0000 Received: by neghvar.compsoc.com (Postfix, from userid 1019) id 7FB021F937; Fri, 25 May 2012 16:19:39 +0100 (IST) From: ciaran@member.fsf.org (=?utf-8?Q?Ciar=C3=A1n?= O'Riordan) To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Scope of AL-2 patent grant Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:19:39 +0100 Message-ID: <7oaa0ws2yc.fsf@neghvar.compsoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi all, I know grant scope is an old topic. I've spent about 6 hours reading the legal-discuss archives from 2005 and 2008, but my question might be simple... If I have an encryption patent which is infringed by an AL-2 licensed project FOO (for simplicity, it is not an ASF project), and I contribute some unrelated memory management code to FOO, do the users then have a licence to use my encryption patent? Here's the first half of AL-2 section 3: each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. So, the resulting patent licence will apply to the whole Work (line 4). Great. And what is granted (which claims) in this patent licence? Lines 6-8: the claims infringed by my Contribution (irrelevant here), and the claims infringed by combination of my Contribution with the Work. Is that the sum of the claims infringed by my contribution plus by the existing Work? Or is it the claims which are infringed *because* my contribution was added? I.e. the claims infringed by my contribution, and the claims infringed partly by my contribution (but not claims which are infringed by parts of the Work unrelated to my contribution). I'm beginning to think the answer is obvious, but I just wanted confirmation. Thanks. --=20 Ciar=C3=A1n O'Riordan +32 (0) 485 118 029 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org