Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 789EE90BE for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48652 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2012 13:59:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 48331 invoked by uid 500); 31 May 2012 13:59:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 48321 invoked by uid 99); 31 May 2012 13:59:24 -0000 Received: from issues-vm.apache.org (HELO issues-vm) (140.211.11.160) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:59:24 +0000 Received: from isssues-vm.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by issues-vm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85DC1402B8 for ; Thu, 31 May 2012 13:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:59:24 +0000 (UTC) From: "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" To: legal-discuss@apache.org Message-ID: <241088251.21867.1338472764756.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> In-Reply-To: <1241370917.10481.1338288023281.JavaMail.jiratomcat@issues-vm> Subject: [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-137) Ownership of WSDLs and XSDs created by interrogating proprietary web services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13286572#comment-13286572 ] Sam Ruby commented on LEGAL-137: -------------------------------- re: "other implementors of the standard"... is this a standard? The title of this JIRA implied that this interface is considered proprietary by the owner. re: "Maybe a java impl that could have a java2wsdl run on it?". I don't think the proper question is one of what tool could be used to produce the output. I think the question is more along the lines of "are such APIs copyrightable?" (the answer to that question seems unclear these days), and independent of the answer to that question: do the authors of this interface consider it to be proprietary? > Ownership of WSDLs and XSDs created by interrogating proprietary web services > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LEGAL-137 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-137 > Project: Legal Discuss > Issue Type: Question > Reporter: Karl Wright > > In the .NET framework, any service can be interrogated to find its Web Services API (represented by a set of WSDL and XSD files), using a .NET tool called "disco.exe". My question pertains to the ownership (or lack thereof) of such WSDLs and XSDs. Can these be redistributed in original or modified form in an Apache project? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org