www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: MPLv2 on AL2 header review ...
Date Wed, 30 May 2012 16:59:27 GMT

On May 30, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Richard Fontana wrote:

> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:27:10AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I would also re-iterate Sam's post that the advice provided
>> here does not constitute "real" legal advice; it is a
>> list for the discussion of legal issues but should not be
>> used, or perceived, as the ASF (or anyone one, or any entity)
>> providing authoritative legal advice.
> 
> I understand of course it is not legal advice. But who would
> someone/something like Michael/LibreOffice/TDF talk to learn how the
> ASF authoritatively interprets the license it specifically is
> granting?  I am asking out of more general interest, not specifically
> about LibreOffice and AOO.
> 

Here, of course. But the issue is the distinction between
discussion and advice.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message