Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6774951E for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38721 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 12:47:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 38453 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2012 12:47:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 38446 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2012 12:47:23 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:47:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of asanso@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.185] (HELO exprod6og103.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:47:12 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob103.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT4bOumHgYO0WCaBheR4oKW0BTl7Y+W/g@postini.com; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:46:51 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q3CCifJ0017320; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q3CCklYr028824; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eurhub01.eur.adobe.com (10.128.4.30) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:46:47 -0700 Received: from eurmbx01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.32]) by eurhub01.eur.adobe.com ([10.128.4.30]) with mapi; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:46:43 +0100 From: Antonio Sanso To: "legal-discuss@apache.org" CC: "amber-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:46:41 +0100 Subject: IP Clearance for Apache Amber Thread-Topic: IP Clearance for Apache Amber Thread-Index: Ac0YqlAM1rsVdve7TSuxHkxsP74S5w== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F488502E951E450AA87C1CDDCE2416EEadobecom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_F488502E951E450AA87C1CDDCE2416EEadobecom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'd need some advice regarding some issue we have with Apache Amber. The project has been on incubator fro a while and we would like to try to g= raduate. Problem is we have been stuck with a legal issue. The problem is more or less the follow (this is the short version): An OAuth 2.0 project, LeeLoo, was being developed by Newcastle Uni. We inv= ited them to join the Amber project with their code. That code was committed to the repo before a grant was provided by Newcastl= e Uni, whose copyright is on the code. In order to better explain the overall situation in details I have dug a bi= t in the mailing list in order to provide a timeline of what has been happe= ning. 10/10 First mention of Leeloo [0] 11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1] 11/10 Moving Leeloo code to Apache repository [2] 12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3] 12/10 IP clearance for Leeloo contribution [4] 12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation 07/11 IP clearance and first release [5] 09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6] 01/12 ASF license and copyrights [7] Now IANAL and I am kind of new in Apache but as long as I understand we are= stuck at the IP clearance: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ambe= r-leeloo.html Am I correct? Is there any other thing we can do rather then rewrite the co= de from scratch ? Thanks in Advance Antonio 0] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201010.mbox= /%3C4CA5A544.3040407%40pidster.com%3E [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbo= x/%3CAANLkTi%3DEp6Df48aFZdB%2BmokAp6HO7-ncmoVdjELKnzwz%40mail.gmail.com%3E [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbo= x/%3CAANLkTik3xt1H7nOaVGWPUSY9MrkKTPymffd%2BHT7r421A%40mail.gmail.com%3E [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbo= x/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmail.com%3= E [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbo= x/%3CAANLkTikHhU9gQKAJPtVfXOTrWJQM-XiTkSkBhQpWJfiz%40mail.gmail.com%3E [5] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201107.mbo= x/%3CCAPz8h_XGY5gpMCqVyBxYBJ%2Bg%3DuDCgj-VPttNoKyEb5H4K7JR1w%40mail.gmail.c= om%3E [6] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201109.mbo= x/%3CCA%2Bc2x_U%3DdtA9UpzpsvbrtNVypcqXEvvq6O8TEGY5D_bLm7ZXRQ%40mail.gmail.c= om%3E [7] http://mail-archives.apac --_000_F488502E951E450AA87C1CDDCE2416EEadobecom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

I'd need some ad= vice regarding some issue we have with Apache Amber.
The project has been on inc= ubator fro a while and we would like to try to graduate.
Problem is we have been= stuck with a legal issue.
The problem is more or less the follow (this is the s= hort version):

An= OAuth 2.0 project, LeeLoo, was being developed by Newcastle Uni. &nbs= p;We invited them to join the Amber project with their code.
That code w= as committed to the repo before a grant was provided by Newcastle Uni,= whose copyright is on the code.

In order to better explain the overall situa= tion in details I have dug a bit in the mailing list in order to provide a = timeline of what has been happening.

10/10 First mention of Le= eloo [0]
11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1]
11/10 Moving Leeloo code to A= pache repository [2]
12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3]
12/10 IP clearance for Leelo= o contribution [4]
12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation
07/11 IP clearance and firs= t release [5]
09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6]
01/12 ASF license an= d copyrights [7]

Now IANAL and I am kind of new in Apache but as long as I= understand we are  stuck at the IP clearance:  http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/amber-leel= oo.html

Am I correct? Is there any other thing we can do rather then rewri= te the code from scratch ?

Thanks in Advance
An= tonio


<= div style=3D"margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin= -left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; color: rgb(20= , 79, 174); ">[3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mo= d_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO= 0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmail.com%3E
= --_000_F488502E951E450AA87C1CDDCE2416EEadobecom_--