Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA35B997F for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40064 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2012 13:22:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 39885 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2012 13:22:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 39875 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2012 13:22:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:22:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.178] (HELO mail-gx0-f178.google.com) (209.85.161.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:21:52 +0000 Received: by ggno1 with SMTP id o1so1867361ggn.23 for ; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:21:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=byYFgXQrCyPt5JwZMwf+mRIZs4lTjBtGklgij/guNdM=; b=ldp2ZlX23vXvXfKPQOkK2p43O2jOFoofpah4c/Etb/BRCnt5IF9XRtuFQwtIUyYqO4 BhvaJ34k46qJankjgCyfSZTuQftCBS0dQpSFLOtc9gpJ/0Zti0cmHNoi4BJ2D6QEuBY8 ZbV6L1OzO1adRY9oKeHP4NZc9Vs3yoNvnAwa7IyBcZ8rM1GB0liZcsykchq8fEHDJ0UK hpbdyJRRliQT+MDiyov2XOKlnqTyWCxXSfuIPbtcSoUHl647P6HYNg/ZAIasTwmV1Azk ZYKqMYz5+At20yyg3idSGtYdkkoysrv5TaA9OT7R2ERnCcsCtsWdn9QMr70y/hjgD5Kw J7WA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.47.231 with SMTP id g7mr1504427ign.12.1334323291250; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:21:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.166.10 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:21:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:21:31 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: kr87CUQNZRZQZo4GjT7atrzQr44 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IP Clearance for Apache Amber From: Sam Ruby To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The timing is what it is. If there still is a possibility of obtaining a Software Grant, then that's the easiest path forward. Otherwise, demonstrating that you have ICLAs from each of the authors of this code and documenting that they confirm that they have the rights to contribute this code is sufficient. - Sam Ruby On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > Hello, > > I'd need some advice regarding some issue we have with Apache Amber. > The project has been on incubator fro a while and we would like to try to > graduate. > Problem is we have been stuck with a legal issue. > The problem is more or less the follow (this is the short version): > > An OAuth 2.0 project, LeeLoo, was being developed by=C2=A0Newcastle Uni. = =C2=A0We > invited them to join the Amber project with their code. > That code was committed to the repo before a grant was provided by=C2=A0N= ewcastle > Uni, whose copyright is on the code. > > In order to better explain the overall situation in details I have dug a = bit > in the mailing list in order to provide a timeline of what has been > happening. > > 10/10 First mention of Leeloo [0] > 11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1] > 11/10 Moving Leeloo code to Apache repository [2] > 12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3] > 12/10 IP clearance for Leeloo contribution [4] > 12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation > 07/11 IP clearance and first release [5] > 09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6] > 01/12 ASF license and copyrights [7] > > Now IANAL and I am kind of new in Apache but as long as I understand we > are=C2=A0=C2=A0stuck at the IP > clearance:=C2=A0=C2=A0http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/amber-leel= oo.html > > Am I correct? Is there any other thing we can do rather then rewrite the > code from scratch ? > > Thanks in Advance > > Antonio > > > 0]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/2010= 10.mbox/%3C4CA5A544.3040407%40pidster.com%3E > [1]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201= 011.mbox/%3CAANLkTi%3DEp6Df48aFZdB%2BmokAp6HO7-ncmoVdjELKnzwz%40mail.gmail.= com%3E > [2]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201= 011.mbox/%3CAANLkTik3xt1H7nOaVGWPUSY9MrkKTPymffd%2BHT7r421A%40mail.gmail.co= m%3E > [3]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201= 012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmai= l.com%3E > [4]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201= 012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikHhU9gQKAJPtVfXOTrWJQM-XiTkSkBhQpWJfiz%40mail.gmail.com%= 3E > [5]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201= 107.mbox/%3CCAPz8h_XGY5gpMCqVyBxYBJ%2Bg%3DuDCgj-VPttNoKyEb5H4K7JR1w%40mail.= gmail.com%3E > [6]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201= 109.mbox/%3CCA%2Bc2x_U%3DdtA9UpzpsvbrtNVypcqXEvvq6O8TEGY5D_bLm7ZXRQ%40mail.= gmail.com%3E > [7]=C2=A0http://mail-archives.apac --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org