Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B79169805 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35471 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2012 22:11:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 35310 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2012 22:11:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 35302 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2012 22:11:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:11:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.50] (HELO mail-bk0-f50.google.com) (209.85.214.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:11:03 +0000 Received: by bkuw11 with SMTP id w11so234277bku.23 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=txnZEgz69RJaRJ795gUelkxYlHE90rcFYtf+3aGoF3Y=; b=WjT/8AESqZTc6rbPwnrV+3+YSC3C7ng5O9bAV9YBuYbMYAPuXLkieIbF8t9KNNcgwC Ro+xh7ZI5AlLgUOMRGQBJkeOfq9mAONzUmn63C+2lL9Z6EJ44nJqXOxwcsPpOqPP/O07 BuPQ0XR0S5Kitlrhc4PivQtnV5zVoi3bZfeMRfK4QreVbpLdpoq/xep+2jIFtQN6bv44 UY6RDnH4WpB+D9nBt8NisRGkRMv5TfBLMihu/FvEib5UcS791u+ixlXmN6OZpDps9PfS iQR7i56i0Qk+4s8VJwo/PZ5S8B8v3R+1qj/SkTrTJsN6n1HQiJgzLmYUkK1Ly/Bx3JZU me8w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.157.12 with SMTP id z12mr6143680bkw.135.1333491042540; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.164.74 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [206.190.64.2] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 15:10:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Github pull requests vs JIRA checkbox From: Marvin Humphrey To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkvJD8bQGXXwamiWSoNfmTh8Q81bMhYkSVzOWCQyt/bLgRL/T6sSb9Rm/Iwl3/0KnIpNENt On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> Perhaps it's possible to augment the pull request notifications with >> the SHA sums from the commit sequence? > > That's certainly doable. Any takers? I'd like to help. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4651 Add SHA sums to Github pull request notifications Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org