www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [RE-VOTE #3] adoption of mod_combine subproject
Date Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:16:22 GMT
On 3/28/2012 6:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Guys.  You were asked a boolean question.  I'm pretty sure it was
> intended to be taken literally.  Have you considered just answering it?

I believe that you meant to direct this to Graham and cc me, and not visa
versa, since I don't have such an answer.  I also believe he did so (you
might also refer to the bugzilla ticket Sam hasn't replied to yet).

I had a question; Roy introduced a claim that he had, back in the day,
confirmed with legal that the process is not applicable for contributions
authored by committers, and some other contexts.  The "IP Intake Process"
(as comfortable as a visit to the Gastroenterologist) needs to be reclaimed
by the *legal committee* which has that charge across all PMCs (incubator
included), and taken off the hands of the Incubator committee which isn't
given jurisdiction over TLPs.  That Incubator documentation seems to be
inconsistent with the prerequisites as defined by Sam.

My question, where is the handling of large code submissions to existing
top level projects documented, to satisfy the concerns of legal@?  Please
reclaim and refine.  Are the TLPs accountable to Incubator guidance?
I don't see where that was assigned.

Thanks for giving some thought to the bigger picture, Daniel and team.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message