Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83B9794E1 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91456 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2012 02:11:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 91276 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2012 02:11:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 91260 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2012 02:11:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:11:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.178] (HELO mail-iy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.210.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:11:41 +0000 Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so11211487iak.23 for ; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:11:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fQlmLDMJzNkxNCdyaMCTLHP1lsTOroRZgjGazjZcTwE=; b=TrAWhQ2guMUEMpFexurdz1zf9ILRQ+OiJk7gy4BegIxBfjlZksQ+wt/C3wvrmLGaTl e3Puy7tv3MnecwA7hUYyjYPKodUG6ceY5tjRBc6gUwLO3yE7BMeYDfc2hr/tHho+TVVa v0ymdqdGXiH7KA4mLGV83xx/HYQKLhQixMfKTtjOnuqU8YnmhiSqRhJALtZ0mjpB6kt9 7+hvgnOosjLOdRQ2XByT1nd6KHJ6sgvAbdTQWpLDSMCLjie3yg6Iv20mYSVwoajx/a0h jNPpB5TSZTkr+c5HHTSBbls39hJ7uvx6/NbKGPUUPgcLqnc4h4sWGh+2mGXJSBrUnJtq vozw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.94.229 with SMTP id df5mr7604158igb.1.1332814280674; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.21.42 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 19:11:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <076001cd0b87$43bbbd00$cb333700$@com> References: <076001cd0b87$43bbbd00$cb333700$@com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 22:11:20 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EOJmW1K2PSzM18PlZF8oLXtF7ho Message-ID: Subject: Re: use of LICENSE and NOTICE From: Sam Ruby To: legal-discuss@apache.org, lrosen@rosenlaw.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote: > even though we have concluded that this doesn't affect Apache's > implementation of Adobe's claimed technology. This is not the conclusion reached by the chair of the PMC in question: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201203.mbox/%3C987183469.31899.1332175719110.JavaMail.tomcat%40hel.zones.apache.org%3E - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org