www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From S├ębastien Brisard <sebastien.bris...@m4x.org>
Subject Re: [commons-math] compatibility of licenses?
Date Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:26:30 GMT
2012/1/11 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:
> +1 to Gregs arguing. Legally there is imo no need to add this license, because the work
is derivative enough to make it an 'own distinct solution'.
>
This is actually good to know. Thanks!
>
> But it's always a good thing to show respect and be thankful by adding something like
>
> "Implementation of the {@link #sample} method is inspired by the triangular distribution
implementation of the rv Python module (Release 1.1 27-Nov-98), by Ivan Frohne."
>
> or similar.
>
This goes without saying.
>
> It might also be an option for the commons PMC to personally reach out to him, notify
him and send him a personal 'thank you'. Maybe he is even interested to help out in other
areas as committer in the future ;)
>
Posted on the developper's mailing list.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
Thanks again!
S├ębastien


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org


Mime
View raw message